Social and Moral Development Index and Basic Demographics

The Social and Moral Development Index is a formulaic aggregation of many factors. It concentrates on moral issues and human rights, violence, equality, tolerance, freedom and effectiveness in climate change mitigation and environmentalism. A country scores higher for achieving well in those areas, and for sustaining that achievement in the long term. Those countries towards the top of this index can truly said to be setting good examples and leading humankind onwards into a bright, humane, and free future. See: "What is the Best Country in the World? An Index of Morality, Conscience and Good Life" by Vexen Crabtree (2013).

 

 

Country Social & Moral Development Index1Higher is better Life ExpectancyHigher is better Gross National Income PPHigher is richer UN's Human Development IndexHigher is better Population Land Areakm2 People Per km2Higher is worse  
Iceland 90.7 81.9yrs $29 176 0.91 328 290 100 250    
Sweden 90.2 81.6yrs $36 143 0.92 9 495 392 410 340    
Norway 89.2 81.3yrs $48 688 0.96 4 960 482 304 250    
Denmark 88.3 79.0yrs $33 518 0.90 5 592 738 42 430    
Finland 87.7 80.1yrs $32 510 0.89 5 402 627 303 890    
Estonia 81.8 75.0yrs $17 402 0.85 1 339 762 42 390    
World Average 58.9 70.0yrs $12 703 0.67 25.74m 536 254 48  
Scandinavia Average 88.0 79.8yrs $32 906 0.90 4.52m 172 135 26  

Not showing due to lack of data: The Faroe Islands and Svalbard. This page only shows places where the database has enough data to be able to come to reasonable conclusions about each place. The main focus is on nation states, but, some distinct external territories may be listed if the database has enough information about them. Averages are calculated from as many valid data points as possible, meaning, that some territories and locations that are not listed above may still be used to calculate some of the average values. Some calculations only use Independent State data - hover the cursor over values to see hints.

“The Nordic region [...] has the world's highest taxes and most generous welfare benefits. And yet Sweden, Finland and Denmark (Norway's oil sets it apart) have delivered strong growth and low unemployment, and rank among the world's most competitive economies. Nordic companies are strong in technology and research and development. Their health-care and educational systems are much admired. And, unlike other European countries, most Nordic states run healthy budget and current-account surpluses. Sweden, whose 9m people make it by some way the biggest Nordic country, is a particular favourite. A year ago the Guardian, a British newspaper, said it was the most successful society the world had ever known.”

The Economist (2006)2

Many European governments have looked to Scandinavia for models and inspiration; delegations have gone to study their education systems, government organisation, social methods and economic policies.

“The truth is that there is never a single economic model for other countries, even the Nordic states, to follow. Neither membership of the EU nor adoption of the euro seems necessary:Sweden is in the EU but not the euro, Finland is in both, Norway is in neither. Different countries have different strengths. Mr Bildt puts forward his own tongue-in-cheek recipe for the perfect "Nordic model", stretching the geography: Finland's education, Estonia's progressive tax policy, Denmark's labour market, Iceland's entrepreneurship, Sweden's management of big companies and Norway's oil. The right conclusion, in other words, is that it is wisest not to look for a single-country model at all, but just to take best practice wherever you find it.”

The Economist (2006)2

Human Rights and Moral Development

Country Social & Moral Development Index1Higher is better Gender Inequality3Lower is better Human Rights Treaties4Higher is better Press Freedom5Higher is better LGBT Equality6Higher is better
Iceland 90.7 0.09 91.5  
Sweden 90.2 0.05 90.8  
Norway 89.2 0.06 93.5  
Denmark 88.3 0.06 92.9  
Finland 87.7 0.08 93.6  
Estonia 81.8 0.16 90.7  
World Average 58.9 0.38 15.1 67.5 -7
Scandinavia Average 88.0 0.08 20.2 92.2 170
 

Religion and Beliefs

Disbelief in God (2004)7 Religiosity (2009)8 Jews (2010)9 Christians (2010)9 Muslims (2010)9 Hindus (2010)9 Buddhists (2010)9 Folk Religion (2010)9 Unaffiliated (2010)9
  Denmark 48% 19% 0.1% 83.5% 4.1% 0.4% 0.2% 0.1% 11.8%
  Estonia 49% 16% 0.1% 39.9% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 59.6%
  Faroe Islands     0.1% 98.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 1.7%
  Finland 28%   0.1% 81.6% 0.8% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 17.6%
  Iceland 16%   0.1% 95.0% 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% 0.5% 3.5%
  Norway 31%   0.1% 84.7% 3.7% 0.5% 0.6% 0.1% 10.1%
  Svalbard                  
  Sweden 64% 17% 0.1% 67.2% 4.6% 0.2% 0.4% 0.2% 27.0%
World Averages 9.9% 75.1% 0.5% 60.6% 22.4% 2.0% 3.5% 2.7% 7.9%
Scandinavia Averages 39.3% 17.3% 0.1% 78.6% 2.0% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 18.8%

Links:

  • Compare to other regions of the world
  • A List of All Religions and Belief Systems
  • Institutionalized Religions Have Their Numbers Inflated by National Polls
  • Secularisation Theory: Will Modern Society Reject Religion? What is Secularism?
  • Human Religions
Disbelief In God (2007)
Sweden 64%  
Estonia 49%  
Denmark 48%  
Norway 31%  
Finland 28%  
Iceland 16%  
Data Source

 

Belief in God (2005)
  Estonia 16%
  Sweden 23%
  Denmark 31%
  Norway 32%
  Iceland 38%
  Finland 41%
Data Source: 10

 

Least Religious (2009)
Estonia 16%  
Sweden 17%  
Denmark 19%  
Data Source

The tables on the right give 3 different ways of looking at a similar trend. Firstly, the "Disbelief in God" and "Belief in God" tables are opposites - you can infer that if you add up the two values, what you are left with is those who are unsure. Because the datasets are obtained via different polls, using differently worded questions, you can expect irregular results as people's responses to questions on religion depend a lot on how the question is phrased. Local terms and associations colour people's perceptions of what is being asked. Even polytheists, who believe in many gods, will say "no" if asked "Do you believe in God?" as the capital-G-God might make them think that the question is really asking "Do you believe in the Abrahamic God of Judaism, Christianity or Islam?". So, wordings are important, which means poll results can differ more than expected. Nonetheless, the results of the two belief-in-god charts are quite harmonious - the two Scandinavian countries that disbelieve in god most strongly (Sweden and Estonia are also those who believe in God least, and these are also two of the least religious countries in the world too.

The standard nordic religious structure combines a secular (non-religious) society with an anachronistic state-backed established church, for example the Lutheran church of Finland. Most people sign up for this church in order to obtain clergy for weddings and funerals. So, although 85% of Finns sign up, it "need not imply a deep belief in the tenets of Martin Luther"11. The local sociologist Kimmo Ketola says that "Finns are neither very attached to religion, nor very opposed to it"11. This is evidenced by the explosive popularity of a website designed to make it easy to resign from the state church. Set up by The Freethinkers of Tampere in 2003, by 2007 over 60 thousand people had used the site to resign and in total the Lutheran Church lost 2.6% of its adherents from 2000-200612. Over a generation of 60 years at the current rate, the Church will lose nearly a third of its membership by 2060.

“The Freethinkers of Tampere created a web site, Eroakirkosta.fi ("eroa kirkosta" roughly translates to "resign from the church"), in 2003 to assist people to resign from the state church to further the goal of separation of state and church, and to promote a secular society. The web site became a success; in 2006 79% of all resignations went through the site. The same figure was 69% in 2005, and 39% in 2004.”

www.eroakirkosta.fi (2007)12

Secularisation Theory: Modern society will continue to reject religion

With distinct pagan roots in Nordic warrior religions Nordics were never subjugated by Christian armies and the Inquisition never gained a hold13. They are now thoroughly secular societies. The sociologist of religion, Steve Bruce, says that Scandinavia became secular largely because the established churches represented the élite, "the masses found themselves little served by a state church which drew its professionals from the upper classes and advanced the ideological perspectives of the socially dominant"14. I have chartered the massive decline in religiosity in the UK, but Norway has much lower Church attendance15.

On top of that, Scandinavia, in particular Norway, has cultivated and spawned some powerful anti-religious movements. The Black Metal movement that grew to infamy in the 1990s hit the national newspapers with almost one-hundred church burnings, and espoused a venomously anti-Christian doctrine. Its adherents worshipped Odin, the Norse gods, and Satan. They wanted not only the continued decline of Christianity, but a revival of Nordic paganism. In addition, Scandinavia has a healthy population of LaVeyan Satanists.16

In Norway a government-appointed commission in 2006 proposed that the Lutheran Church be disestablished, similar "to changes made by the neighbouring (Lutheran) Church of Sweden, in 2000", the UK's National Secular Society reported:

“CHURCH OF NORWAY VOTES TO DISESTABLISH ITSELF
The Lutheran Church of Norway has voted to separate itself from the state after 500 years of establishment. Sixty-three of 85 synod delegates voted that the church should no longer be referred to in the country's constitution as a State or national church. The synod wants the church to be founded on a separate act passed by parliament. The general synod said it should itself assume all church authority now resting with the king and the government.

"The synod's decision is historic", said Jens Petter Johnsen, director of the Church of Norway national council. "What matters is the relationship between Church and people, not between Church and State. We will do our utmost to strengthen the service of the church and with our people."

[...] The changes in the State Church system will require a revision of the country's constitution and some officials see 2013 as the earliest date. The State-Church system was established in Norway in 1537, when the Danish king endorsed the Lutheran reformation.”

National Secular Society newsletter (2006 Dec 01)

4. Geographical, Political and Historical Definitions of "Nordic" and "Scandinavian"

The Essential World Atlas describes the geographical features of Scandinavia: "Scandinavia is the wide peninsula that divides the Norwegian Sea from the Baltic Sea and Gulf of Bothnia. [...] The Scandinavian Peninsula is dominated by a mountain chain that runs for almost its entire length. In the west, the peaks and plateaus drop steeply to the sea. To the east, they incline more gently towards Sweden's coastal and southern lowlands, and the flat, lake-studded terrain that covers most of Finland. Separated from Sweden by a sliver of sea, Denmark consists of fertile plains and low hills. In stark contrast, far-flung Iceland is a mountainous, mostly barren land that continues to be fashioned by earthquakes, volcanoes, and Europe's largest glaciers."17.

Various definitions lead to different lists of which countries are Scandinavian or Nordic. Daftly, some people even get offended by others' definitions. Scandinavica.com tries to clear it up18:

Geographically speaking, the Scandinavian peninsula is a territory shared by Norway, Sweden and northern Finland. The Scandinavian countries would therefore only be Norway and Sweden.

Linguistically, Swedish, Norwegian and Danish have a common word called "Skandinavien" which refers to the ancient territories of the Norsemen, and for most people in these three countries "Scandinavia" consists only of Sweden, Norway and Denmark. This one is considered to be the most commonly accepted definition of "Scandinavia". However, Iceland was also a Norse territory and Icelandic belongs to the same linguistic family as Swedish, Norwegian and Danish. And so does theFaroe islands. Therefore, you will find some people for which Scandinavia is Sweden, Norway,Denmark and Iceland. And finally, Swedish language is also spoken in Finland and reciprocally, Finnish and Sami languages are spoken in Sweden and Norway. Again, we have a new definition of Scandinavia, which would include Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland and Finland.

Culturally and historically, the north of Europe has been the political playground of the kingdoms ofSweden, Denmark and Norway. Finland was a part of the kingdom of Sweden and Iceland belonged to Norway and Denmark. Besides a common history, politically and economically these five countries have followed a similar model known as the Nordic welfare state since the 20th century. One more time, these five countries are perceived as an unity by some and therefore called by the same name: "Scandinavia".

What are the "Nordic countries"? In such a state of linguistic and geographical confusion, the French came to help us all and invented the term "Pays Nordiques" or "Nordic Countries", which has become the most standard term to bring together Scandinavia, Iceland and Finland under the same umbrella.

5. Estonia: Scandinavian?

We saw above that Mr Bildt (Prime Minister of Sweden 1991 to 1994) described Estonia as part of Scandinavia (2006 Sep)2, but this claim remains largely ignored. As Estonia was once 'part of' or a colony of Sweden, it borders the Gulf of Finland, and as it shares many cultural, some linguistic, and economic factors with Scandinavia, some have called for Estonia to be considered Scandinavian19. It is traditionally considered one of the Baltic countries, like Latvia and Lithuania. The colonial history of Sweden provides a 100-year window whereEstonia was 'scandinavian', but this is a tenuous and arbitrary connection.

In the 16th century, Sweden slowly increased their grasp of the eastern shores of the Baltic and during the rule of Erik XIV from 1567 Sweden saw northern Estonia steadily absorbed into their empire. Gustav II Adolf from 1611, invaded Latvia and consolidated Swedish rule of the eastern side of the Baltic. During the reign of King Karl XII, who ruled the Swedish empire from 1697 to 1718, Latvia and Estonia were lost to the Russians after a defeat at Poltava in 1709.20. The public will require time and much convincing if Estonia is to be considered Scandinavian rather than Baltic.

Sweden (As of 2006)

Sweden Kingdom of Sweden [Country Profile Page]
Status Independent State
Social and Moral Index 2nd best
Capital Stockholm
Land Area21 410 340 km2
Location Europe, Scandinavia
Population22 9.495 million
Life Expectancy23 81.591yrs (2012)
GNI23 $36 143
ISO3166-1 Codes24 SE, SWE, 752
Internet Domain25 .se
Currency26 Kronoa (SEK)
Telephone27 +46
 

The Best Country in the World! Listed as the 6th best country in the United Nations Human Development Report 2005. Sweden in 1919 was part of the general European rush towards female emancipation, although it was not a world leader in equal votes for women it was still one of the first 10% of the world to arrive there. In modern times, Swedenhas the best record for gender equality across a range of issues. It has the worlds' sixth highest life expectancy. The Economist Quality of Life study states that Sweden is the fifth best place to live. From 2001 to the 2003-2004 and 2006 reports, the World Economic Forum has shown Sweden is consistently the third most economically competitive country. Its government was the first, in 1987, to recognize same sex partnerships. One of the least obese countries (10.4% of the population, perhaps 8th least obese in the developed world).Sweden has the best 'high literacy' rate in the world, and not just by a small margin! For a developed country, Swedes do not smoke much and do not drink much; both far less than Western averages. Sweden ranks top in allowing open access to scientific research. In 2005, out of the worlds' most developed countries, Sweden was fourth most generous in giving aid to developing countries, and in 2006 was the 3rd best country for the poor. It has the 7th lowest level of computer software piracy. Transparency International finds Sweden to be the joint fourth for lack of corruption.

“The most successful society the world has ever known”

The Guardian28

Sweden is one of the world's best recyclers, and Stockholm hosts the world's second-largest hydrothermal cooling system, saving megawatts of energy that would otherwise be used to electrically power air conditioning29.

“Every country has its stereotypes and clichés but, let's face it, who wouldn't want to live up to the image that Sweden has in the outside world? A nation of tall, blonde, attractive types, famously open-minded and nonaggressive (well, at least in the recent past). A country full of athletic folk [...] at the cutting edge of technology (think Ericsson), well cared-for by the state and living very comfortable lives: flash cars parked in the garage (think Volvo and Saab) [...]. Dig even slightly below the glossy surface and you'll find more to be impressed by. [...] Sweden is also home of the Nobel Peace Prize.”

"Sweden" by Carolyn Bain (2003)30

Denmark (As of 2006)

Denmark Kingdom of Denmark [Country Profile Page]
Status Independent State
Social and Moral Index 4th best
Capital Copenhagen
Land Area21 42 430 km2
Location Europe, Scandinavia
Population22 5.593 million
Life Expectancy23 78.971yrs (2012)
GNI23 $33 518
ISO3166-1 Codes24 DK, DNK, 208
Internet Domain31 .dk
Currency26 Krone (DKK)
Telephone27 +45
 

Only listed as 14th in the world by the United Nations Human Development Report, Denmark is nonetheless a consistent high-ranker in many of the moral issues examined on this page. The World Economic Forum lists Denmark as the 4th most equal country in terms of gender, and was beaten by only four other countries in the historical granting of equal votes to women. The Economist's World in 2005 survey hadDenmark rank as the ninth best country for quality of life. The fourth most competitive economy. Gay rights were attained in the 1990s, beaten only by a handful of states. One of the least obese countries in the world. The 3rd best country in the world for high adult literacy. One of the best countries towards the environment; one of the best recyclers. Open Access to scientific research speeds up scientific discovery and advances humanity, Denmark is the 7th most open country in the world. When it comes to accepting asylum seekers,Denmark accepts more than anyone else (74%). It also gives aid third most generously, and does not tie its aid in to its own economy. The Center for Global Development says thatDenmark is the second best country at helping the poor of the world. Denmark has the fifth lowest rate of computer software piracy. Transparency International rates Denmark as (jointly) the least corrupt country.

Denmark's Labour Market:

“Unemployment, at 4.5%, is at its lowest in over 30 years, inflation is below the euro-area average and growth is faster. The budget surplus hit 3.9% of GDP in 2005. It is Denmark's exceptional performance on jobs that has attracted most attention. [...] The government cannot take all the credit, but many economists fulsomely praise "flexicurity" - a peculiarly Danish blend of a flexible labour market, generous social security and an active labour-market policy with rights and obligations for the unemployed.”

The Economist (2006)2

Norway (As of 2006)

Norway Kingdom of Norway [Country Profile Page]
Status Independent State
Social and Moral Index 3rd best
Capital Oslo
Land Area21 304 250 km2
Location Europe, Scandinavia
Population22 4.96 million
Life Expectancy23 81.251yrs (2012)
GNI23 $48 688
ISO3166-1 Codes24 NO, NOR, 578
Internet Domain32 .no
Currency26 Krone (NOK)
Telephone27 +47
 

Impressively listed as the best country in the United Nations Human Development Report every year since 2001. The fourth country to allow women the same voting rights as men, in 1913 and coming in 2nd best in the world for gender equality overall. The 12th best life expectancy in the world. The third best country to live in for quality of life. One of the world's most economically competitive countries, coming in annually around 6th (2003-2004) and 12th (2006). It was the second country to officially recognize same-sex marriages, granting almost full legal equality for gay partnerships in 1993. Impressively Norway is the fourth least obese developed nation in the world, only 8.3% of the population are obese.Norway has the second highest high literacy level in the world, second only to Sweden. Norway gives a higher percentage of its National Income as foreign aid than does any other country, and was the 4th best country for the poor in 2006.

However its capital city, Oslo, is the most expensive city to live in in the world (2006, 2007) 33. Norway's wealth comes largely from its off-shore oil deposits, and it very wisely invests much of this for future generations34.

Finland (As of 2006)

Finland Republic of Finland [Country Profile Page]
Status Independent State
Social and Moral Index 6th best
Capital Helsinki
Land Area21 303 890 km2
Location Europe, Scandinavia
Population22 5.403 million
Life Expectancy23 80.148yrs (2012)
GNI23 $32 510
ISO3166-1 Codes24 FI, FIN, 246
Internet Domain35 .fi
Currency26 Euro (EUR)
Telephone27 +358
 

Listed as the 13th best country in the United Nations Human Development Report 2005. One of the first countries to give women equal votes with men, beaten only by New Zealandand Australia in 1893 and 1902 respectively. Judging by a range of criteria Finland is in modern times the fifth best country for gender equality. 19th best life expectancy. The most economically competitive country according to the 2001, 2003, and 2004-5 reports from the World Economic Forum (and 2nd place to Switzerland in 2006), with the USA as their hottest contender and previous title-holder. Finland was not one of the first countries where legal equality for homosexuals were attained, but in 2002 it is still ahead the majority of the countries in the world that have not yet got there. Perhaps one of the least obese countries, 10th or so in the developed world. Finland is the fourth best country in the world for high literacy. Open access to scientific research is beneficial to humanity; Finland is the sixth most open country in the world. The 7th best country for the world's poor, in 2006. It has the 4th lowest computer software piracy rate. Transparency International rates Denmark as (jointly) the least corrupt country.

“[Despite having been in] one of the worst recessions any European country has seen [...] their small country (5m people) is at or near the top of most league tables: [...] first in the OECD's world ranking of educational performance; second-highest share of R&D spending in the European Union. The country is reversing its demographic decline: its fertility rate is one of the highest in Europe. A Finnish group even won this years' Eurovision song contest.”

The Economist (2006)36

The 'real lesson' to learn from Finland is organisation and responsibility. Its government makes tough political decisions that are unpopular but good for the long-term health of the country36, and has a powerful green lobby, showing responsibility for both self-care and world-care.

“Around two-thirds of Finland is covered in forest and about a tenth by water. In the far north the White Nights, during which the sun does not set, last for around 10 weeks of the summer. In winter the same area goes through nearly eight weeks when the sun never rises above the horizon.”

BBC Website37

http://www2.helsinginsanomat.fi/ lists:

  • The largest share of women in the workforce (48.1%)
  • The most literate teenagers, according to a December 2001 OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) report
  • The most enthusiastic adult takers of exercise (more than 80% of Finns over the age of 15 spending over 3.5 hours a week)
  • The greatest quantity of strictly protected forest land (slightly under 7% of the total forested area, mostly old-growth forests).
  • The least indebted households (outstanding household loans, mortgages, etc. account for 33% of GDP, whereas the average eurozone figure in 2000 was 56%).
  • The greatest number of high-tech patent applications (better than Germany)
  • Helsinki is: The cleanest capital city
  • The best public institutions infrastructure
  • The most squeaky-clean officials and politicians

Criticisms

Finland is also the most expensive country in Europe, the most violent society in the EU and has the least dense motorway network (is this good or bad though?). It is a small country of only 5 million people which are largely ethnically homogenous36. With this small size and simple make-up, Finland faces fewer problems than other developed countries, so its success is partially an accident. It is also fortunate to be home to one highly successful company, Nokia, on which it largely depends36.

Criticisms

Taxes (% of GDP)
On Income, Wealth, etc. (not trade).

Rank
1. Denmark 30.3 Denmark 30.1
2. Sweden 22.2 Norway 21.7
3. Finland 21.3 Iceland 19.4
4. Norway 20.2 Sweden 19.4
5. Belgium 17.1 Finland 17.8
6. UK 16.6 Belgium 16.8
7. Iceland 16.5 UK 15.6
EU Average (EU25) 13.8   12.5

Source: Eurostat38

The Nordic states consistently have the world's highest taxes2 (see chart), pursued half-heartedly by Belgiumand the UK and the most expensive living costs. Those who live there tend not to complain, as they have a very high quality of life, but, immigrants and outsiders could easily be overwhelmed.

Have other criticisms of Scandinavia? Post them here.

An issue of the future is the demographic shift towards an older population - the 'demographic crises', something all developed countries are having to face up to. Although low unemployment may sound good; a combination of a labour shortage and a greying workforce means that many Nordic countries' economies have are being throttled. As a result, wages will rise as companies cling to their existing employees, and therefore exports will suffer due to an increase in the cost of goods.

“The Swedish response has been the most radical: a proposal that will virtually guarantee entry to any non-EU worker with a job offer from a Swedish employer. [...] The labour minister, Tobias Billstrom, says foreign workers are needed to counter a greying population and shrinking labour force.”

The Economist (2008)