ФАКУЛЬТЕТУ МІЖНАРОДНОГО БІЗНЕСУ І МІЖНАРОДНОГО ПРАВА
МОДУЛЬ №3
З ТЕОРІЇ І ПРАКТИКИ ПЕРЕКЛАДУ
ДЛЯ 3-го КУРСУ
ФАКУЛЬТЕТУ МІЖНАРОДНОГО БІЗНЕСУ І МІЖНАРОДНОГО ПРАВА
(перший рівень складності)
* Лексичні елементи, що позначають етноспецифічні елементи:
* Реалії вважаються
* При перекладі реалій використовують такі способи:
* З точки зору перекладу всі назви поділяються на такі групи:
* Назви навчальних закладів, факультетів, кафедр, лабораторій перекладаються таким чином:
* Загальні слова, що входять до складу назв, які містять, крім того, власні імена, перекладаються таким чином:
* Фірмові назви
* Власні назви
* Англійські скорочення перекладаються
* Наведіть можливі способи перекладу виразу “in terms of”.
* Абсолютно неподільні стійкі словосполучення, загальне значення яких не залежить від значення слів, з яких вони складаються – _________.
* В ідіомах зв’язок між прямим і непрямим значеннями _________.
* Фразеологічні зрощення мають такі характерні ознаки:
* Що характерно для фразеологізмів з явно вираженим національним забарвленням?
* З точки зору перекладу фразеологічні звороти зручно розділити на ______ груп(и).
* Образні фразеологічні звороти, побудовані у вигляді порівнянь, з точки зору перекладу можна поділити на ____ груп(и).
* Назвіть основні способи перекладу фразеологізмів:
* Find the English equivalents of the following "померти", "бойкотувати кого-небудь, перестати спілкуватися з ким-небудь"
* Find the English equivalents of the following "зв'язок", "запомога країнам, що розвиваються"
* Find the English equivalents of the following "обирати", "окуповуватися"
* Find the English equivalents of the following "електроніка", "готовність поступитися (на користь)"
* Find the English equivalents of the following "протекціонізм", "придбати"
* Find the English equivalents of the following "підтримувати", "підтримувати добробут економіки та народу"
* Let this be written.
* Do not let them differ greatly.
* Let me state the question in a slightly different way.
* This classification is not referred to in the subsequent text.
* I wish scientists of all viewpoints could read and consider this point.
* We wish many scholars would regard this proposal.
* Suffice it to say that there are a number of arguments that converge.
* This point seems to have been overlooked by researchers.
* The reason for this must be just here.
* A form of international dispute settlement that attempts to reconcile parties to a disagreement by use of negotiation, mediation, or inquiry
* The process of reaching an agreement by conferring or discussing.
* Bringing about a peaceful settlement or compromise between parties to a dispute through the benevolent intervention of an impartial third party.
* A third party who provides the means by which two disputing parties may communicate with each other.
* The process by which an impartial third party makes an independent investigation and suggests a solution to a dispute.
* The process by which an impartial third party makes an investigation to determine the facts underlying a dispute without resolving the dispute itself.
* The authority or power of a court or tribunal to hear a particular case or dispute.
* The power of a court to hear a matter that involves a dispute between two or more parties.
* A unilateral grant of jurisdiction by a state to the International court of Justice that allows the Court to resolve disputes involving that state.
* A state has to correspond to a suit brought against it before the International Court of Justice only to the extent that the state bringing the suit has also accepted the jurisdiction of the Court.
* A reservation that allows a state to exclude from the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice any dispute that it determines a domestic matter.
* The power of the International Court of Justice to give opinions about issues of international law at the request of the United Nations or one of its specialized agencies.
* International intergovernmental organization responsible for implementing and enforcing international rules regulating trade between nations.
* The process by which parties to a dispute submit their differences to the binding judgement of an impartial third person or group selected by mutual consent.
* To voluntarily give up a legal right is…
* The requirement that a tribunal must have power over the parties before it may hear a dispute.
* A human being is …
* A legal entity created by national or international law.
* A suit in which parties are not at odds but in which they cooperate to obtain a judgement.
* A disagreement as to the existence of a legal right or obligation, or as to the nature and extent of the compensation due for breach of such a right or obligation.
* A commitment of money or capital in order to earn a financial return.
* The court or locale wherein causes are judicially tried.
* Freedom or exemption from a burden or duty, such as from the obligation to appear before a court.
* Doctrine that a court has criminal jurisdiction if the offence was committed within the forum state.
* Doctrine that a court has criminal jurisdiction if the defendant is a national of the forum state.
* Doctrine that a court has criminal jurisdiction if the national interest is injured.
* Doctrine that a court has criminal jurisdiction if the forum state has the defendant in custody.
* Doctrine that a court has criminal jurisdiction if the victim is a national of the forum state.
* The power of a court or tribunal to determine the rights of a party who appears before it.
* The process of reconciling the parties to a disagreement by negotiation, mediation, or inquiry.
* The process of reaching an agreement by discussion.
* Negotiations between states are most commonly conducted … an ad hoc basis, but sometimes the procedure is more formal.
* …involves the use of a third party who transmits and interprets the proposals of the principal parties and sometimes advances independent proposals.
* When mediators provide a channel of communications only, it is said that they are offering their…
* When mediators make a formal investigation and present a formal proposal, they are involved in a …
* An … is a process used to determine a disputed fact or facts.
* Before the ICJ can hear a contentious case, all of the states parties … the proceeding must have recognized the Court’s jurisdiction.
* …allows states to make a unilateral declaration recognizing “as compulsory ipso facto and without special agreement, in relation to any other state accepting the same obligation, the jurisdiction of the Court in all legal disputes.”
* One questionable device that states have used to recognize the Court’s jurisdiction under the Optional Clause but to still have a way out if they decide they do not want to respond to a particular suit is known as a …
* The ICJ’s …exists so that the Court may give opinions about issues of international law at the request of the United Nations or one of its specialized agencies.
* The decision of the Court has no binding force …between the parties and in respect of that particular case.
* Most states have voluntarily complied with the judgments handed …by the Court.
* … is responsible for implementing and enforcing international rules regulating trade between nations.
* The …encourages member states to resolve disputes through consultation with each other.
* The requesting member can seek the establishment of a WTO …
* ...is actually the WTO General Council convened under its own Chairman and following its own rules of procedure
* Should a …be needed, it will be made up of three panelists unless the parties agree within 10 days of its establishment that it should consist of five panelists.
* The function of a …is to assist the DSB.
* The …is an appeals board made up of seven persons, three of whom will serve on any one case.