Various Types and Ways of Forming Words
Word-formation is the system of derivative types of words and the process of creating new words from the material available in the language after certain structural and semantic formulas and patterns. A distinction is made between two principal types of word-formation: word-derivation and word-composition.
The basic ways of forming words in word-derivation are affixation and conversion. Affixation is the formation of a new word with the help of affixes, e.g. heartless (from heart), tooverdo (from to do). Conversion is the formation of a new word by bringing a stem of this word into a different formal paradigm, e.g. a fall (from to fall), to slave (from a slave). The basic form of the original and the basic form of the derived words in case of conversion are homonymous.
Word-composition is the formation of a new word by combining two or more stems which occur in the language as free forms, e.g. door-handle, house-keeper.
Apart from principal there are some minor types of modern word-formation, i.e. shortening, blending, acronomy, sound-interchange, sound imitation, distinctive stress, and back-formation.
Shorteningis the formation of a word by cutting off a part of the word. According to the part of the word that is cut off (initial, middle or final) there are the following types of shortenings: 1) initial (or aphesis), e.g. fend (v) < defend, phone < telephone; 2) medial (or syncope), e.g. specs < spectacles, fancy < fantasy; 3) final (or apocope), e.g. ad, advert < advertisement, veg <vegetables; 4) both initial and final, e.g. flu < influenza, fridge < refrigerator.
Blending is the formation of a new word by combining parts of two words. Blends may be of two types: 1) additive type that may be transformed into a phrase consisting of complete stems combined by the conjunction and, e.g. smog – sm(oke) and (f)og; restrictive type that can be transformed into a phrase, the first element of which serves as a modifier for the second, e.g. telecast – television broadcast.
Acronomy (or graphical abbreviation) is the formation of a word from the initial letters of a word combination. There are two basic types of acronyms: 1) acronyms which are read as ordinary English words, e.g. UNESCO [ ] – the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; 2) acronyms with the alphabetic reading, e.g. BBC [ ] – the British Broadcasting Corporation.
Sound-interchange is the formation of a word due to an alteration in the phonemic composition of its root. Sound-interchange falls into two groups: 1) vowel interchange: food – to feed. In some cases vowel-interchange is combined with suffixation: strong – strength; 2) consonant-interchange: advice – to advise.
Consonant-interchange and vowel-interchange may be combined together: life – to live.
Sound imitation (or onomatoporia) is the naming of an action or a thing by a more or less exact reproduction of the sound associated with it, cf.: cock-a-doodle-do (English) – ку-ка-ре-ку (Russian). Semantically, according to the source sound, many onomatopoeic words fall into a few very definite groups: 1) words denoting sounds produced by human beings in the process of communication or expressing their feelings, e.g. chatter, babble; 2) words denoting sounds produced by animals, birds, insects, e.g. moo, crack, buzz; 3) words imitating the sound of water, the noise of metallic noise, a forceful motion, movements, e.g. splash, clink, whip, swing.
Back-formation is the formation of a new word by subtracting a real or supposed suffix from the existing words. The process is based on analogy. For example, the word to butle “to act or serve as a butler” is derived by subtraction of –er from a supposedly verbal stem in the noun butler.
Distinctive stress is the formation of a word by means of the shift of the stress in the source word, cf.: increase (n) – in crease (v), absent (adj) – ab sent (v).
AFFIXATION
Affixationis generally defined as the formation of words by adding derivationalaffixes to different types of bases. Affixation includes suffixation and prefixation. Distinction between suffuxal and prefixal derivatives is made according to the last stage of derivation. For example, from the point of view of derivational analysis the word unreasonable – un+(reason-+-able) is qualified as a prefixal derivative, while the word discouragement – (dis-+courage) +-ment is defined as a suffixal derivative. But from the point of view of morphemic analysis these words are specified as prefixal-suffixal derivatives.