Evaluation criteria of oral (written) survey
| № | Evaluation criteria | Level | |||
| Perfect | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | ||
| 1. | The level of understanding of the topic | ||||
| 2. | The ability to think logically | ||||
| 3. | Conformity of the material to the raised questions | ||||
| 4. | The presence in the response of all the necessary theoretical facts | ||||
| 5. | Illustration of the answer with correctly chosen examples | ||||
| Total |
Maximum score – 100
Evaluation rubric
Evaluation criteria analysis of the clinical situation
| № п/п | Criteria evaluation | Level | |||
| Perfect | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | ||
| 1. | After reviewing the clinical situation, identified the leading symptoms of the disease. | ||||
| 2. | Evaluated the results of objective research. | ||||
| 3. | Identified a number of similar diseases | ||||
| 4. | The survey included relevant research methods. | ||||
| 5. | Justified the choice of research methods | ||||
| 6. | To adequately interpret the obtained (expected) the results of the research | ||||
| 7. | Logically carried out differential diagnostics with similar diseases and reasonably ruled them out | ||||
| 8. | Substantiated the diagnosis | ||||
| 9. | Made a plan of treatment (management) of the patient | ||||
| 10. | Argued the choice of treatment taking into account criteria of efficiency | ||||
| 11. | Demonstrated knowledge of the mechanism of action of prescribed drugs. | ||||
| 12. | Formulated the necessary recommendations for the patient. | ||||
Maximum score – 100.
Evaluation rubric
Evaluation criteria for interpreting the results of x-rays
| № п/п | Evaluation criteria steps | Level | |||
| Prfect | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | ||
| 1. | At the General survey radiographs determines the type (intra - or wheretobuy, orthopantogram, etc.) and projection image (video, side, polyacetylene, etc.). | 12,5 | 8,5 | 6,25 | |
| 2. | The object of study (upper, lower jaw, teeth formula.) | 12,5 | 9,5 | 6,25 | |
| 3. | To analyze the crown of the tooth (teeth) – shape, size, presence of defects; analysis of the root of the tooth (the roots) – the number, shape, size, contours, root canals differenziata (dedifferentiate), the degree of filling. | 12,5 | 9,5 | 6,25 | |
| 4. | To analyze the periodontal slit width, uniformity, condition compact end plate (thinned, destroyed, thickened). Upon detection of the degradation (dilution) or osteosclerosis (consolidation) to determine the shape, size, contour, intensity and character of the structure (homogeneous, inhomogeneous, cellular, multi-camera), communication with the tooth, with the follicles. | 12,5 | 9,5 | 6,25 | |
| 5. | Correctly assesses the state of periodontal tissues (atrophy, periodontal pockets, evaluating the interdental partitions (shape, location of the apex), as a compact end plate (stored, thinned, thickened)) | 12,5 | 9,5 | 6,25 | |
| 6. | To determine the structure of the bone – rarefaction (osteoporosis, destruction, atrophy, osteolysis) or thickening (osteosclerosis etc.) | 12,5 | 9,5 | 6,25 | |
| Identify other pathological changes on radiographs, to assess its character, magnitude, performs their interpretation. | 12,5 | 9,5 | 6,25 | ||
| Gives adequate diagnostic conclusion for a pathological process in the maxillofacial region these changes are characteristic. | 12,5 | 9,5 | 6,25 | ||
| Total |
Maximum score – 100.
Evaluation rubric for practical skills
A survey of surgical dental patient